Oct 04 2011

Lapierre Zesty 314 2012 review

Category: Bike Reviews Pete @ 11:13 am

The new Lapierre Zesty 314 for 2012 has moved things on quite a bit. First of all, I could see that there had been some changes at the back of the bike but as with all these things, we can get bogged down with the changes to a full suspension trail bike so instead of listening to the blurb, I got the chance to take off with it.

First of all, I did not notice that many changes but then, our Lapierre Zesty 314 2011 demo bike had been sold a little earlier than normal as they had proven to be very popular so I had not ridden it for a while. I thought it was my imagination but over the small bumps, I had felt that it was a little plusher. I wondered if this was the upgrade to a Fox RP2 rear shock but once I had thought about it for more than 1.2 seconds, I realised that this would not help. Later I realised that this was because of the new OST+ suspension on the new Zesty, which is more progressive than before, and is quite soft in its initial range. Whereas before the Propedal was not available on the Fox aircan, I think (rather cynically) that it is now included to jack the bike up a bit in the first part of its travel. To be fair, it is a very welcome addition anyhow, as Propedal is always good for those tarmac climbs that you just cannot avoid. Same as before however – it does not really feel any more or less efficient, just much nicer on the small bumps and the whole bike feels a lot lighter.
In addition to the upgraded shock, upgraded gearing (much more XT is prevalent on the 2012 Lapierre Zesty 314) and gold bits, the bike is now one degree slacker. This slacker head angle is never normally loved by me, because I am an oddball. However, I got used to this really quickly (perhaps because I had been riding our Whyte 146 S and our Pivot Mach 5.7 demo bikes a lot recently) and found that I could spend more time over the front of the bike. It was very reassuring once I stopped moving backwards on the bike all the time!

One other thing I noticed was that it appeared to be a little easier to move about on the descents and felt like it was digging in a little more on the climbs. This could be attributed to the new OST+ suspension but I discovered later that the chainstays were shorter too (I’m glad I don’t review bikes for a living but then I did not have a tape measure or am that sad!) so this probably had a great effect on the handling too.
Lapierre Zesty 314 2012 Flying Fox Bikes
The Fox Float forks on the front of the Lapierre Zesty 314 tracked as well as usual and the rear suspension and handling of the bike as a whole felt better than normal. I had wanted to ride this bike because my cynical nature had told me that it would be no better than previous incarnations (which were and are amazing anyhow). However, the new OST+ suspension on the Zesty does raise its game enough to be ahead of any bike I know at this price and the bang for buck on this bike is truly phenomenal.
The only difficulty is that while this bike has become even better value for money, which in these times is pretty amazing, so has the next model up: the Lapierre Zesty 514 for 2012 now has a full carbon frame and good enough kit to make it killer value for £500 more. 2012 is going to be an amazing year for the Lapierre Zesty.


Mar 09 2011

Pivot Mach 5.7 wee review

Category: Flying Fox View Pete @ 12:08 pm

I have finally had a good ride on the Pivot Mach 5.7 so can make some comments on it.  First of all, this is a pretty big bike with a Dave Weagle link, which many people rave about.  All that techno mumbo jumbo doesn’t interest me! However, now it does because this bike REALLY climbs well.  I used Propedal as I was on automatic pilot but quickly turned it off, as it was unnecessary.  Even on the road it’s not really that important. For a bike with this much travel, that is impressive! The head angle feels pretty slack but you can still get over the front to keep the front wheel from wandering so it instils a lot of confidence.  This is something I really need to have a look at, as the head angle is apparently 68.5 degrees or thereabouts.  It feels closer to 67.5 to me (I ride Whyte 19s with exactly that head angle and Lapierre Zestys and they feel very similar).  EDIT: I’ve found out why:  you use lots of sag with this link so it puts everything back the way so it must slacken the head angle by at least a degree – it appears I’m not losing it after all.

Through the usual trails, which had suddenly got a little slippery, I was impressed.  Inevitably, I’m comparing with what I am used to and I felt that it climbed even better than the Lapierre Zesty, which is an amazing bike for the money and has a great following from us.  Overall, would I buy one over a £2300 Zesty though, when the frame alone on a Pivot Mach 5.7 is £1799?! I’m still figuring that one out, as I would be happy with both but if I had the money, I think I would get myself a Pivot.

The suspension is super-smooth on the downhills and the technical bits were covered with ease I am simply not used to.  It is not invincible the way a bigger bike is (such as the Pivot Firebird I tried last week), which is perfect – I don’t like using big bikes through the usual terrain as they make things a little boring!  However, I noticed how smooth the  suspension is simply because the Fox fork did not seem to keep up quite as well as I would expect (the ones I tried were non-FIT forks, and I think I can tell the difference).  No problems though – it’s just when something is so good, it often shows up things you had previously thought were perfect!  I even got the jump off a wall in the local Mine Woods completely wrong (obviously on purpose, just to test the bike!) and I got away with it due to the forks and the amazing rear suspension.  Then again, so did my riding buddy, Ben, on the Lapierre Zesty and we both survived.

Build kit: Unimportant really for a frame such as this but it should be mentioned.  It came with full SRAM X0 2X10. I use this kit myself on my Morewood Zula and it’s fantastic but I know why I couple it with Formula The One brakes. The SRAM X0 brakes (Avids) leave me uninspired, especially with a 160mm front rotor. Whose idea was that?  I know I’m spoilt with my brakes but still, a bigger rotor to make up for the lack of power is no bad thing.  Super nice lightweight but tough DT Swiss wheels were a fantastic touch and a great help to the light weight of this all round trail machine.

Did I like it though? YES! So much so, I’m thinking of buying a Pivot Mach 4 for myself (I still like short-travel bikes!) and a Pivot Mach 5.7 for the shop as a demo bike (I may just have to use it from time to time…!!)

UPDATE: We are now a Pivot dealer and have a Pivot Mach 5.7, Mach 4 and Firebird on their way. I looked at the price list as well, which we will put on our website soon, and it compares favourably with its competitors – the frames are a bit more expensive than its competitors (all DW link bikes are) but I can see why and the build kits are very cheap for what you get. You should get a very well specced Pivot Mach 4 or Pivot Mach 5.7 for a similar price to a Lapierre Zesty 514 or 714, Turner 5 Spot build, Rocky Mountain or Trek Fuel.


Jan 19 2011

Nightriding on Monday night

Category: Flying Fox View Pete @ 11:31 am

Ox and I went out on Monday night with our new Exposure demo lights.  I had the Six Pack (I’m the boss and I’ve always wanted to say I have one) and Ox had the Diablo helmet light and Maxx-D front light.  We rode out of the front door and towards the woods at the back of the University of Stirling. Ox saved his energy by drafting me along the road with the excuse that he had a small flashing LED (mine) on his backpack (mine!). He was also kept warm by a Smartwool Sport NTS base layer (mine).

Anyway, once we were in the woods, we realised how powerful these lights really are – we climbed on medium setting most of the time and used them on high power the rest of the time (we did not turn them off during stops either).  For some reason, even though the country is flooding, all the trails were pretty amazing although there were a few places where it was crunchy undertyre but also muddy. We had a fair few sketchy moments on the descent of Mine Woods but we got through for our climb up to Kippenrait Glen. A beautiful descent followed by Darn Walk allowed us to see the river that had burst its banks the previous day back to normal.

After hearing that Ox was “pooped”, we then climbed back up to Mine Woods again and then along the back roads home. First crash of the night came when Ox turned a corner on the road and hit black ice. Nasty one but he got away with it (just shows – the crashes always happen when you’re nearly home on easy terrain!).

We were out for 2 1/2 hours and the only light which was starting to drain was the USE Exposure Six Pack, which was showing an amber light. Not bad when you consider that high power should drain the battery in 1 1/2 hours!

The lighting was fantastic from all the lights, although I do still prefer the spread from a Hope Vision 4.

Roll on the Spring.


Jan 13 2011

Whyte T-120 S initial thoughts

Category: Flying Fox View Pete @ 6:53 pm

They came in, today. I couldn’t wait to see this bike but I really didn’t think the downhill boys (mechanics) and even Jeff would share my sentiments about what a piece of work this bike is.  It’s dripping with kit, has a Maxle back-end, Maxle front, great robust forks, great detailing, lightweight and has the typical Whyte backup and warranty. Most importantly, it’s already in Flying Fox bikes colours!

The bad bits: they’ve saved money on the finishing kit – saddle, bars, stem and seatpost. However, it’s all really nice, lightweight kit that matches the bike and looks phenomenal. So no problems there then.  The seatpost is 27.2mm – this caught me off guard. This limits your choice of uppy-downy seatpost. Strange. For me, I don’t care as it has the best Q/R seatclamp in the business. Some people may not like this fact though and will have to get a Gravity Dropper, as they seem to be very good in 27.2mm guise. Maybe I’m missing the point of this bike though? A bigger front rotos would have been nice too but then I need to lose some weight!

Positives: Monarch shock – very, very good. It’s no longer the fact that without a Fox shock, every bike is a mess. This is a phenomenal shock and works well on this bike. Brakes – very good for the money, very adjustable, our mechanics like them and they’re pretty reliable. Gears – SRAM 2X10 – on this machine it doesn’t get any better – perfect for the pedalling and pivot point of this machine. I have this on my bike and it cost a fortune separately. Rockshox Reba 120mm forks – with a Maxle Lite, colour matched with the frame and parts and the guys round here use them around here for years. We like. Wheels – WTB kit, reliable and great – even the tyres are fantastic all-round tyres (thank you Whyte for ditching those Mountain Kings – we thought we were going to be killed!).

No bob so far to speak of (although I was riding around the shop!!!) but I’m not sure if I should step up to the large yet. Oh, hang on, this bike isn’t for me (if I repeat that enough, I shall start believing it!).


Dec 25 2010

Singletrack December 2010 Editors’ Choice

Category: Flying Fox View Pete @ 1:49 pm

I cannot type them all out just now but the ones that I have had personal experience of and agree with are noted below (!):

Sim: Favourite components of 2010

Continental Rubber Queen Tyres (they’re in the shop but not the website!)

Get these in the Black Chili compound and 2.2in size and you have possibly the best all-round trail tyre out there. Loads of grip, not much weight or rolling resistance and they wear reasonably well too. Rubber love is not wrong.

Crank Brothers Joplin 4 seatpost

No more ‘I wish I had my saddle down for that bit’ regrets, push the lever and the saddle is out of the way so you can fully enjoy the trail. As eye-opening as the first time you fitted disc brakes and grabbed a handful of brake lever, but without the bruising.

More to come when I get chance.  It’s Christmas Day for crying out loud!


Dec 05 2010

Gee Atherton vs David Knight at Fort William DH course

Category: Flying Fox View Pete @ 12:34 am

Downhill bike at Fort William with Gee Atherton or Enduro bike with David Knight?  Fort William DH course is designed for a downhill mountain bike and Gee Atherton has some knowledge of the course but then David Knight is majorly talented and has an engine!

http://video.mpora.com/watch/pRUvdUU8j/


Dec 01 2010

Scottish Trail Centres, what do you think?

Category: Flying Fox View Pete @ 10:11 am

I have to admit, I’m hitting this wee article with a lot of negativity so don’t expect this to go well.  First up and controversial to say the least:

Forestry Commission

I’m no expert but as far as I can see, they are hanging folk out to dry – the effective founders of Glentress and the girls who built it up to be what it is today have been left out of their latest tender so they’re going to lose what they have built up.  Carron Valley was another story of a lot of disgruntled folk walking away (these are both my opinion as an outsider with a whole lot miised out!).  I like mountain biking because it’s my chance of escape, not to get enveloped in political crap.

The future

If mountain bikers have a place to go then does that mean we are not going to be allowed on proper trails in the future?  This is the scariest element to me.  I would much prefer a ride up the local hills, whatever the weather, than having to get in a car and drive to a trail centre.  Very few (much less than 1%) would actually ride to a trail centre so surely this is bad for the environment too?

“Winding down” a hill

I hate berms and constant “keep your height” rubbish. I much prefer a proper steep descent than only losing ten metres of height in 5 corners.  Berms and silly jumps are about as natural and beautiful as Jordan.  There’s really no need for either on God’s clean earth!  (Just to contradict myself I really like the berm at the bottom of Cannonball Run at Carron Valley!)

I haven’t been to that many but…

Laggan Wolftrax almost feels natural from time to time and I absolutely love getting as many laps in as I can.  The bike shop is okay and the cafe fine.  Even my buddy Danger gets (more than) chatted up by the staff in the cafe too so it’s a nice wee departure from natural riding.  The black is something to aspire to (for me, having not done every feature!) and the reds are swoopy and fun.

Carron Valley used to be good fun and the lack of “motorway” tyre surface (i.e. more rugged) was a nice change.  That’s all changed however and it’s been tamed unfortunately.  Whoops.

Glentress is a massive disappointment for me.  The black is good fun and nothing like what I imagine a black to be as it’s not difficult.  However, it feels natural and exposed in places, which is more my bag.  The red is okay but nothing inspiring and the blue is great for beginner’s so there’s a reason for that one.  Otherwise, it’s a total yawn fest and waste of fuel.

Dalbeattie

Love it!  Not much climbing and some nice technical (semi-natural?) features.  Good time, not very busy but one of the best.

So, it appears I like them after all…apart from the fact that I would much prefer to be up Dumyat, Ben Cleuch, the Lairig Ghru, Ryvoan Pass, Menstrie Glen or sliding my way down Kippenrait Glen on my backside watching my pals doing the same!


Dec 01 2010

Ghost AMR Lector 8700 (YELLOW!) mini-review

Category: Bike Reviews Pete @ 9:27 am

We are just back from a Ghost demo day at Glentress and I got to try out this carbon beast for much of the day on bits of the red, blue and black routes at Glentress trail centre.

I’m still not convinced on trail centres.  So much so, that next time I get dragged to Glentress, I hope it’s on a cross bike.  I’ll have to write another wee separate report on how much I adore them.

Anyhow, the bike.  For once, I had managed to get the sexy one – Lector is Ghost’s way of saying that it’s carbon and I think it saves almost 1 1/2 lb over the aluminium AMR 7500.  It retails at a penny short of £3K and for that you’re getting full carbon frame, tapered headtube, Fox FIT forks, full XT groupset, Fox RP23 etc. etc.  Prices have gone up across the board but this is still well priced for the equipment on it.  8700 denotes full carbon main frame and carbon chain- and seatstays, 7700 is identical but it has aluminium rear triangle (and you save £250).  The 7500 has the same componentry but has a full aluminium frame for £2400.

I was not prepared to get on with this bike.  After all, it reminds me of a Trek Fuel EX and I have never enjoyed any of those I have tried.  Plus, it’s not actually that light (I’m being mean!).  I went out of the top car park and onto the red trail and the beast was climbing well.  The fireroad passed quicker than I had thought it would and it was enjoyable (apart from Jeff moaning about his seatpost slipping down all the time).  Onto the red, and it was plain to see why people like this bike.  The suspension is super-supple (much more than I am used to) and the beast climbed better than I had believed.  Pro-Pedal is necessary but that’s why it’s there.  Up to the top of Spooky Wood and we met the usual Specialized guys, who wanted to trounce us because we were on blingy bikes.  We descended but Jeff got overtaken by one of them.  He puts it down to the fact that his saddle squirming around is a wee bit disconcerting…  In the setting of a trail centre, this bike is phenomenal – great up and magnificent down.  I haven’t tried it elsewhere but one thing I noticed is that the suspension is so plush that it soaks up EVERYTHING.  Never had that before!  However, one down side is that without Propedal to jack it up, I clouted the pedals (at a trail centre!).  To be fair, most people are not riding the silly natural stuff around Stirling but I really do think that if you’re not a trail centre fiend, then you might end up destroying the bottom half of the bike on anything on the trail.

Ghost AMR vs. Trek Fuel EX: I’m no journalist and I have not tried every bike Trek have produced but I have had lots of rides on different bikes and in this case, I think the Ghost definitely has the win.  The suspension is incredibly supple, the parts better for the money, they are not as ubiquitous (important!) and while it suffers a little under braking compared to the Trek (I’m being really picky now!), the suspension is much more supple overall and it climbs better.  The Ghost also looks fantastic and there’s great backup warrranty-wise etc.  Bear in mind also that Ghost are not new – only to our shores.  From the top of my head, they’ve been going since around 1992? Go to German-speaking countries (and Northern Italy!) for example and you’ll see tons.  These bikes are built to last, which is why they’re not pushing the envelope on lightweight.

Ghost AMR Lector 8700 vs. Morewood Zula custom build

This is not a fair comparison, my Zula 100mm frame is £1299 alone, without the blingy £700 Crank Bros wheels and SRAM X0 2×10 so the cost is way off.  However, I know the Zula insanely well so I thought it was worthwhile comparing.  As far as technical climbing goes, I feel that the Zula has the Ghost licked (albeit with Propedal engaged!).    Coming down the way, both feel very similar (the Zula has 130mm forks) although the Ghost is especially good at making small bumps simply disappear.  One major factor is that I feel really confident on my Zula and never notice the extra height in the BB (probably only a few mm!) – I never clout anything off the trail at all.

Ghost AMR Lector 8700 vs. Yeti ASR-5

The Yeti is one of our demo bikes and for me, in medium, comes up a little short.  That said, both bikes feel fairly similar.  Unfortunately for this, there is no contest, and while I maintain that the Yeti ASR-5 is still a bit low, just like the Ghost, its abilities and the grin-inducing factor blow away the Ghost every day.


Nov 30 2010

Felt AR5

Category: Flying Fox View Pete @ 4:55 pm

My felt arse has arrived!  It’s not built up yet unfortunately and there’s lots of changes I’m going to make.  Not a great rush for it as yet: the amount of snow and ice has caused my “comeback” to road cycling to be delayed somewhat.  At least I can get out on the snowboard again (a Santa Cruz Perfect 11 snowboard with K2 Cinch bindings that I managed to buy from Flying Fox Bikes!!!).

I hope to update you soon as to how the bike rides…


Nov 30 2010

Cancellara signs for the Luxembourg Cycling Project

Category: Flying Fox View Pete @ 4:51 pm

Okay, so it isn’t really a surprise of any sort but at least it’s now happening.  There was chat he may sign with another team to raise their profile but it’s great to see him with the Schlecks.  Arguably the best rider of 2010 with the guy who should have won the Tour de France, and his brother, who won the Tour de Suisse before breaking his collarbone in the TdF.

Oh, and apparently his “engine” inside his bike was all a load of rubbish – apparently he does actually just turn those pedals round himself.  Phenomenal.  He is cheating though – with all those cycle paths and respect from drivers in Switzerland, at least he isn’t fearful of losing his life on his training runs unlike us in the UK…


« Previous PageNext Page »